The Clintons are getting the old band back together again for one last geriatric tour.
Hillary 2016. Because 22 years of Clintons dominating the Beltway isn’t enough.
Her campaign slogan: “Vote for me. I am a woman. What difference does it make?”
The Draft Hillary movement is really taking off. There hasn’t been this much excitement behind a Draft Hillary movement since, well, the last time there was a Draft Hillary movement.
Remember
that? Back in 2008? When she was the “inevitable nominee”? She was the
“most electable” Democrat running? She was the only one who could beat
the Republicans?
Didn’t exactly work out as advertised. But this
being the Clintons, there is no more shame in that than there is in the
incident with the intern, sketchy stories about cattle futures or
missing law firm records magically reappearing.
They’re not even
changing the talking points. Once again, the nomination is hers for the
asking. She is inevitable — again. It is time for a woman in the White House — again. She is the only electable Democrat in the mix — again.
She’s even picked up a Twitter handle and describes herself as a “glass ceiling cracker.” You go, girl!
Deep
down, she’s got to be having flashbacks and night sweats thinking to
herself: “I have seen this movie before and I really didn’t like how it
ended.”
But what difference does it make? She’s Hillary Rodham Clinton.
The
last time, her exhausting quest ended with her defeated and broke. Then
she had to muster up the energy to dine on some seriously rancid crow
and become the single most visible employee of the man who had beaten
her.
He beat her because she had a history and he did not. He beat
her because she had made very public decisions that he had not faced.
He beat her because she supported a military action overseas that he was
able to blithely campaign against. In the end, he beat her because
people wanted something new. They wanted change.
What difference does it make? In that case, it was the difference between winning and losing.
So, what will have happened in eight years to make her not less, but more, appealing to voters? Absolutely nothing.
It is just eight years more of fraught Clinton
history. Eight more years of public decisions that will be mercilessly
picked apart. Eight more years further and further away from being
something new. She will be a calcified statue representing the very
opposite of change.
She will be forced to answer endless questions
about the deadly terrorist attack in Benghazi. We will see the endless
loop of her baring her teeth during a congressional hearing and angrily
shouting: “What difference, at this point, does it make?”
Cruelest
of all: She will be blamed and pay the political price for every single
unpopular foreign military action the current president has launched
during his tenure. She got beaten last time for being a war hawk. She’ll
get beaten this time because President Obama became the drone-loving
war hawk he had campaigned against.
In 2008, Mrs. Clinton cut an ad showing children asleep. The phone at the White House rings at 3 a.m. announcing some serious national security threat. The narrator intoned: “Who do you want answering the phone?”
Without mentioning Mr. Obama’s name, it was a bid to paint his lack of world experience as a frightening liability.
Well, Mrs. Clinton
certainly does not share any such liability. But eight years on, we now
know exactly what she will say if she ever does have to answer that
phone at 3 a.m. in the White House.
No comments:
Post a Comment