Saturday, January 11, 2014

Real Conservatives will keep on point to win in 2014 and the big one—2016, Expect endless bombshells and distractions

No GOP or Conservative Politician is perfect and they all have a past. The question is how ‘past’ is ‘past’ and how ‘sorry’ is ‘sorry?’

It seems we are standing in a huge and smelly political junkyard of scandals, distractions and egos.  Our eyes desperately look around hoping to catch site of a hero, a real leader who loves God and country, not ego and power.  Instead, we see mostly caricatures running around with sound bite theatre and amnesia about their past dealings. 

They develop fund raising fantasies and junkyard personalities who expect to win elections with us looking the other way.  I’m sick of the smell frankly.  I want to walk around in a beautiful park with a view of the Mountains and future not a smelly diseased junkyard full of political hacks.

I think it is time to flatten a few rotten political cars but before we do that we must think long and hard if there isn’t something to be salvaged and saved.  We must also decide which presented scandals matter and what is the response to those attacks by those wanting political power.

Bombshells and assaults are already flying against anyone who might be a front-runner for the GOP in 2016 or for those conservatives daring to go after the Senate seats in 2014. 

Right now GOP hopeful Governor Chris Christie is trying to survive the George Washington bridge scandal where he is accused of shutting it down to enact revenge against a Democratic Mayor.  To add horror to this and the connecting emails that implicate his staff, a 91-year-old woman died on the bridge in part because the Paramedics couldn’t get to her at the scene.  For Governor Christie, this is a growing nightmare that may be a deathblow to his front-runner chances to run for President.  So far he is saying he didn’t know anything about the bridge closing and was ‘misled.’  He says he is outraged and deeply saddened. 

Maybe Christie didn’t know (as he says so far) but how do you know when politicians on both sides of the line punish and attack each other as a matter of course?  They play the ‘plausible deniability’ card on a daily basis.  “I didn’t know and I’m horrified.”  “I will get to the bottom of this and investigate.”  That is all we hear from Obama is ‘plausible deniability’ and ‘I didn’t know’ when he is standing in a putrid sea of scandals that have gotten so deep he almost needs a snorkel to breathe air now.

In the weeks and months ahead


Look carefully at the facts regarding the ‘bombshell attack parade against any up and coming conservative’ because most the media will continue their junkyard lies and distortion against any conservative.  However, we must also remember that some accusations and scandals might be true.  What will the response be by those attacked?  Will it be a lie to protect their supposed political ground or will they simply and humbly speak the truth whether it was a true accusation or false?

Let us get this country out of the junkyard and vote in people of character who will actually serve ‘the people’, our Constitution and the truth.

Will Obama's Hillarycare be orphaned? The health law, popularly known as Obama Lied About Care, is actually Hillary, Lied About Care, Clinton was the one, in campaigning for her mandate-based plan, who repeatedly said that if you like your plan, you can keep it. and both an employer mandate and an individual mandate.

In all the furor over the Affordable Care Act, one person has largely escaped public scrutiny for her role in the matter: likely Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Success has many fathers, but failure is an orphan.
In the 2008 presidential election, when Clinton campaigned on individual and employer mandates, Barack Obama successfully attacked her on those positions. Clinton was the one, in campaigning for her mandate-based plan, who repeatedly said that if you like your plan, you can keep it. Obama switched his position only after gaining the White House and hitting a wall of political opposition for his “public option.”
The health law, popularly known as Obamacare, is actually Hillarycare.
No one disputes that the left achieved an enormous victory with the law’s 2010 passage after years of political wrangling. But victory became defeat when the system failed on implementation day, Oct. 1. The difficulties persist. Although the law’s supporters argue that only a few technological glitches remain, many health care and legal experts argue that the website’s technological issues are the least of its challenges.
Millions of policy cancellations have left families without coverage. For them, their old affordable insurance plans were better than what Hillarycare offered, a fact the administration has acknowledged by offering them hardship exemptions from the mandate to buy insurance this year. Under the law, many patients report having lost access to doctors, facilities and treatments they need.
Surprisingly, the loudest voices objecting to Hillarycare have yet to connect the dots leading to its passage from the health care policy Clinton long advocated.
The problematic rollout of Obama’s signature law should give Clinton pause. Just as she faces certain scrutiny for her role as Secretary of State in the Benghazi affair, she must be asking whether she can safely distance herself from the political fallout of Hillarycare.
In 1993, Clinton was the original driving force behind health care reform, while today’s political and business leaders had yet to emerge. She advocated what would become the law’s most controversial features while Obama lectured constitutional law and worked in a law firm. As her husband made his mark on the Oval Office, the first lady leaned in on the White House conference table as chair of the health care task force.

Clinton advocated for passage of the Health Security Act and envisioned a fundamental transformation of our health care system, taking it further away from a market-based model. Her plan called for universal health care, relying on an employer mandate that required companies to provide insurance to employees.
In the 1990s, Clinton’s legislative effort became a congressional stillbirth. The first lady went on to become a U.S. senator from New York, never giving up on the effort to federalize health care. Campaigning for the 2008 Democratic nomination for president, Clinton stumped on health care, promising universal coverage through both an employer mandate and an individual mandate.
By contrast, Obama forcefully opposed key elements of Clinton’s plan. “Hillary Clinton’s attacking, but what’s she not telling you about her health care plan?” asked one of his ads, which then presaged what would become Obamacare: “It forces everyone to buy insurance, even if you can’t afford it, and you pay a penalty if you don’t.”
In a 2008 debate, candidate Obama objected to candidate Clinton’s individual mandate because the real reason people don’t buy insurance is because they can’t afford it. Two years later, Congress gave Clinton’s mandate the force of law.
Despite a temporary delay, Obamacare’s employer mandate will apply in 2015 — after the 2014 midterm elections but not before the 2016 presidential nomination battle commences. As she readies her campaign, it remains to be seen whether Clinton will successfully make an orphan of her own work.

Friday, January 10, 2014

Hillary Clinton adviser started an election-day traffic jam in 2000.

Michael Whouley, founding partner of the strategy group tied to Hillary Clinton’s budding 2016 presidential effort, orchestrated a traffic jam to help his client Al Gore win the 2000 New Hampshire primary against Bill Bradley.
Gore campaign manager Bob Shrum wrote in his memoirs about Whouley’s last-minute gambit to use the Gore motorcade to suppress the vote on primary day, as Slate’s David Weigel noted on Wednesday.
“Michael Whouley came up with a last-ditch scheme: Send Gore into areas of southern New Hampshire where there was a lot of Bradley support among upscale voters and commuters who worked across the border in Massachusetts. Many of them cast their ballots late in the day after driving home. Gore’s motorcade — candidate, press, Secret Service, and police — could snarl traffic and keep some of the commuters from ever getting to their polling places or even trying to,” Shrum wrote.

Gore was “irate” at the “massive traffic jam” but then “Gore got the point” after Whouley explained that “they’re mostly Bradley voters.”
Whouley was one of three close officials from the strategy firm the Dewey Square Group who met with Clinton at her Embassy Row house in early summer 2013 to discuss plans for an upcoming presidential effort. Whouley also managed Clinton’s victorious 2008 primary campaign field operation in New Hampshire, eight years after pulling off Gore’s traffic jam in the state.
Whouley was portrayed by actor Denis Leary in the 2008 HBO film “Recount” about the Gore campaign.
Republican New Jersey governor and 2016 presidential prospect Chris Christie is currently under fire for actions apparently taken by members of his staff to close highway lanes in the city of a Democratic mayor who did not endorse his re-election bid, according to recently released staff emails. Christie said in a press conference Thursday that he is “embarrassed and humiliated” by the scandal and he fired his deputy chief of staff Bridget Anne Kelly.
New Jersey U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman, a Hillary Clinton fundraiser and Christie’s Democratic successor in the post, is currently investigating the matter involving Christie’s staff.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/10/hillary-clinton-adviser-started-an-election-day-traffic-jam-in-2000/#ixzz2q1yGjoWk

State Department names groups behind Benghazi strike and Hillary Clinton say in 2012( You know, posting something on Facebook is not in and of itself evidence)

Wed October 24, 2012 CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/24/us/libya-benghazi-e-mails/index.html

Read the rest at the bottom of this blog!

The State Department on Friday for the first time blamed specific groups and militants for the 2012 Benghazi attack, designating them as terrorists -- a move that further undermines initial claims the attack was spontaneous.

The department announced that it was labeling Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi and Ansar al-Sharia in Darnah as terror organizations, in part over their role in the Benghazi attack. It applied the same label to Ansar al-Sharia in Tunisia, over a separate attack on Americans in Tunis

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In an e-mail obtained by CNN, State Department officials notify that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is under attack. In an e-mail obtained by CNN, State Department officials notify that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is under attack.
HIDE CAPTION
State Department e-mail on Benghazi
State Department e-mail on Benghazi
State Department e-mail on Benghazi
<<
<
1
2
3
>
>>

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • NEW: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says don't "cherry pick" documents
  • The White House says it received conflicting information about the attack
  • A government email on the day of the attack says an Islamist group claimed credit
  • The attack left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans dead



Washington (CNN) -- Two hours after first being notified of an attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, a government e-mail to the White House, the State Department and the FBI said an Islamist group had claimed credit, according to a copy obtained by CNN.
An initial e-mail was sent while the attack was still underway, and another that arrived two hours later -- sent from a State Department address to various government agencies including the executive office of the president -- identified Ansar al-Sharia as claiming responsibility for the attack on its Facebook page and on Twitter.
 
The group denied responsibility the next day.
 
However, the e-mails raise further questions about the seeming confusion on the part of the Obama administration to determine the nature of the September 11 attack that left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans dead.
 
Two White House officials, speaking on condition of not being identified on Wednesday, said the government e-mails about the attack were not an intelligence assessment. They also noted that there was conflicting information about Ansar al-Sharia denying responsibility.

Attackers set the U.S. Consulate compound in Benghazi, Libya, on fire on September 11, 2012. The U.S. ambassador and three other U.S. nationals were killed during the attack. The Obama administration initially blamed a mob inflamed by a U.S.-produced movie that mocked Islam and its Prophet Mohammed, but later said the storming of the consulate appears to have been a terrorist attack. View photos of protesters storming the U.S. Embassy buildings in 2012.Attackers set the U.S. Consulate compound in Benghazi, Libya, on fire on September 11, 2012. The U.S. ambassador and three other U.S. nationals were killed during the attack. The Obama administration initially blamed a mob inflamed by a U.S.-produced movie that mocked Islam and its Prophet Mohammed, but later said the storming of the consulate appears to have been a terrorist attack. View photos of protesters storming the U.S. Embassy buildings in 2012.
Attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya
HIDE CAPTION
<<
<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
>
>>
Photos: Attack on U.S. Consulate in Libya Photos: Attack on U.S. Consulate in Libya

Benghazi attack: Who knew what when?

Libya attack suspect speaks to reporter

New Benghazi documents emerge
"They were a part of the many different reports we were receiving that day," one of the White House officials said of the e-mails. "There are always multiple and conflicting reports in the initial hours of an attack. That's why you have an investigation."
 
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton advised reporters to wait until a review panel she appointed to investigate what happened completed its work.
 
"The Independent Accountability Review Board is already hard at work looking at everything, not cherry picking one story here or one document there but looking at everything, which I highly recommend as the appropriate approach to something as complex an attack like this," Clinton said Wednesday.
 
"You know, posting something on Facebook is not in and of itself evidence. I think it just underscores how fluid the reporting was at the time and continued for some time to be," Clinton said.
She repeated her earlier pledge to "take whatever measures are necessary to fix anything that needs to be fixed, and we will bring those to justice who committed these murders."
 
Meanwhile, White House spokesman Jay Carney noted the e-mail about the claim of responsiblity "was an open-source, unclassified e-mail referring to an assertion made on a social media site that everyone in this room had access to and knew about instantaneously."
 
Carney added that "the whole point of an intelligence community and what they do is to assess strands of information and make judgments about what happened and who was responsible."
The day after the attack took place, President Barack Obama referred to it as an "act of terror."
 
But in the following days, Carney maintained there was no evidence suggesting the attack was "planned or imminent."
 
The administration also suggested that an anti-Muslim video produced in the United States likely fueled a spontaneous demonstration in Benghazi as it had in Cairo, where the U.S. Embassy also was attacked.
 
Clinton, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland and Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, all cited the video as a motivating factor in the attack.
 
On September 13 -- two days after the attack -- a senior U.S. official told CNN that the violence in Libya was not the work of "an innocent mob."
 
"The video or 9/11 made a handy excuse and could be fortuitous from their perspective, but this was a clearly planned military-type attack," the official said.
 
However, it wasn't until September 19 that Matthew Olsen, the nation's counterterrorism chief, told senators that it was a terrorist attack. The next day, Carney also said it was "self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack."
 
The e-mails obtained by CNN provide additional insight into the Benghazi attack.
The first one, sent at 4:05 p.m. ET, or 10:05 p.m. in Libya, described a diplomatic mission under attack.
 
"Approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well," the e-mail said. Stevens and four other mission staff were in the compound safe haven, it added.
 
Less than an hour later, at 4:54 p.m. ET, another e-mail reported "firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared." It said a search was underway for consulate personnel.
 
The final e-mail, at 6:07 p.m., noted the claim of responsibility for the attack. The subject line said: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack."
 
"Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli," the e-mail said.
 
The Facebook claim of involvement was subsequently denied by the group at a news conference in the following days, but not very convincingly.
 
"We are saluting our people for this zeal in protecting their religion, to grant victory to the prophet," a spokesman for Ansar al-Sharia said at the time. "The response has to be firm."
 
It is common for one or more claims of responsibility to follow high-profile attacks on U.S. targets, and intelligence officials analyze them for validity before declaring any legitimate. For example, groups make false claims to seek publicity and raise their profile
.
Analysts examine a group's history, whether it made previous claims that were legitimate, whether it has the capacity to carry out such an attack, and whether known members of the group participated in the attack in assessing the validity of claims of responsibility.
 
 
 
Fox News previously reported that the two were suspected of playing a role in the attack. And despite State Department claims that Al Qaeda leadership was not involved and a recent news report echoing that assessment, Fox News has learned that bin Qumu has Al Qaeda ties.

According to his Guantanamo file, he has historic ties to the Al Qaeda network, including training at one point at "Usama bin Laden's Torkham camp.
"
The State Department, in its announcement Friday, specifically discussed allegations against the Ansar al-Sharia branches.

"Ansar al-Shari'a in Benghazi and Ansar al-Shari'a in Darnah have been involved in terrorist attacks against civilian targets, frequent assassinations, and attempted assassinations of security officials and political actors in eastern Libya, and the September 11, 2012 attacks against the U.S. Special Mission and Annex in Benghazi, Libya," the department said. "Members of both organizations continue to pose a threat to U.S. interests in Libya."

Shortly after the attack, administration officials indicated it was related to protests over an anti-Islam film that were raging elsewhere in Africa and the Middle East, describing it as spontaneous. They have since backed off that explanation, though have not ruled out the film as having played some role. Many lawmakers, though, have claimed the film was not a factor and the attack was planned by terrorists.

The department on Friday cited Khattalah and bin Qumu over their leadership roles in the al-Sharia organizations. Khattalah, though, told Fox News in October 2012 that while he was at the U.S. consulate that night, he was not responsible for the attack. He claimed he was helping Libyan security workers defending the compound.

The new terror designation bars anyone from providing or trying to provide "material support or resources" to those organizations and individuals, and freezes any assets they have in the U.S. The State Department announced that it has also updated its Rewards for Justice website to include a reward of up to $10 million for information leading to the arrest or conviction of anyone involved in the Benghazi attack.

The department had faced criticism for not including that reward on the website, though officials claimed reward offers had nevertheless been made.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/10/state-department-names-groups-behind-benghazi-strike/

Four Americans died in the 2012 attack, and so far nobody has been brought to justice in connection with the killings.

"The U.S. government is committed to taking all appropriate actions against the organizations and individuals responsible for the attacks against the U.S. diplomatic facilities in Libya and Tunisia," the State Department said, also referring to a 2012 attack on the U.S. Embassy in Tunis.
Fox News' Catherine Herridge and Greg Palkot contributed to this report.